The Communication Committee is proud to present the first transcription of chronic’Live Action. To start the ball rolling, the first column of Eric, is poaching in the health sector, exceeded topic? Nothing is less sure. The sad truth is that we had the right to a raiding campaign more typical. Changing the name of trade unions and find us in the construction sector, Public Service or the nearest you assembly line.
I decided to make this column, the absurdity of the world, presented to the Action radio program Direct, to show how we live in a world full of contradictions and how the establishment, Media, education and mastery of the official discourse often succeeds in us believe anything. It's also a bit of a snub to the various official and independent media right who say anything in a tone choleric. I decided to essentially do the same thing, but a progressive view. Today I'll talk about the union health poaching. Basically, poaching, is when two union centers are fighting for the representation of a union certification unit. More or less, if you're in the CHUM nurses union, for example, there is a scheduled time in the law where you can change unions, for example, if the union was the CSN, it may decide to go to the FTQ. This one is special, because he was forced by the state. Not so long ago, our trade union centers were all united on the same floor, common front, everyone together against the government and against the health cuts. Then the government has passed the law 10, forcing a grouping, passing CSSS in CIUSSS, which modified union certification units. So instead of fighting this law there, Central decided to clashing to win new accreditation. Oh surprise, we hear no more of Law 10, Now all we hear, it is "our union is better, yours is worse, it has better insurance "etc.. So we can see that the winner of this raid forced out, it is the State, it is the employer, and it just shows how this is bad for trade unionism. It also comforts me in our positions, aux IWW, not to try to go grabber members to other unions and does not decide to accredit, because the government can easily decide to play with these accreditations to put shit in unions. Before you start to get into the thick of it, I wanted you to hear this advertising FIQ (Interprofessional Health Federation of Quebec) :
To describe some, a nurse is seen appears to be in a health facility awaits the elevator. A first door opens with a lot of people who have nothing to do with a nurse : a guy construction, a shop worker, a girl who plays the cello, even a fakir. and there, the nurse made a grimace can be interpreted as "cursed! it is not me ". and there, another door opens with Régine Laurent, the president of the FIQ, worse a nursing gang powder blue smocks that says "embark with us", we look like, Unlike everyone else!
What it tells us this publicity then, and why it is also a bit of bait, is that we should not unite as working class to deal, ensemble, the same pattern. for example, in health, there is, Yes, the professional, the health that the FIQ syndicates, but also, all kinds of craft quarters, as cooks, janitors, orderlies. The message that sends the FIQ, is that we must not unite with the other quarters of business, that have the same pattern as we struggle and solidarity. Non, FIQ'd rather enjoy their professional status-the health to get more crumbs than other quarters of business, considered less important. Short, do not unite on an industrial basis, all having the same boss, but do a craft unionism kind that allows a working elite of going to look for better conditions than their colleagues.
Heeding my courage, and following several discussions with comrades working in the health sector, I went on the website of the various corporatist unions to see the arguments they give for voting for them : The first thing that strikes, is the emphasis on the insurance plans and union dues.
first argument. Each union explains how her insurance plan is the best. It seems to shopping an insurance policy. Question : Do you trust your insurance company? Now imagine what degree of confidence of the people towards the unions ... second argument : Our contributions are lower. Without much explanation of why, all unions have the lowest fees and best managed. It's simple as "Pay less to get more in your pockets" This is also the sales pitch of the Canadian Union of Public Employees (SCFP) to sell their votes. With CUPE, more money in your pockets. There's even calculators how much you save on their website. By the way I checked, dues Wobblies beat all the competition, but OK.
third argument : It is the most numerous Push this argument further. Did you know that the Journal de Montreal is the most read newspaper in Quebec ? Radio X is the most listened to radio in Quebec ? That gives you an idea ... So the FIQ which groups the most professional, CUPE is in FTQ, which has the largest number of members in Quebec, CSN is one that has the most unionized-e-s health. That gives you an idea ... It is the most numerous, so you are cellars if you are not with us.
fourth argument : Our employee-s are the best. Another major trend, e-s-used of all these unions are the best, most competent, most helpful, best organized. You get the picture.
It comes almost to wonder why the IWW have chosen not to have employee-s. It's almost as if these unions boasted of being the best bosses. Or to be the best service machine, it still comes back to the old insurance salesman. fifth argument : the goodies
They do not brag about it on their website, but everywhere on the workplace, central roam distributing various goodies to buy votes. This is so ridiculous that many workers and health workers went to collect. T-shirts, toques, agendas, crayons, bloc-notes, aprons and even glasses of champagne. There's nothing to say, the unions are really there for our needs in times of raiding. It's even worse than politicians campaigning.
Short, what should we learn from this? Never, unions talk of militancy, direct democracy, collective defense, short of all that is the basis of trade unionism. Business unionism is pathetic, shown in its most grime form, that the insurance salesman, that of the small peddler trying to get you for your contributions, that of the multinational trying to buy us blows advertising and empty slogans.
The government is the one that has gained across the board and the unions entered its high-speed game instead to join forces and fight.
The leadership of the FTQ and the Canadian Labor Congress have agreed to limit the solidarity of Canadian unions towards the Quebec student movement to the only channels they are able to control, with the aim of preventing as much as possible “potential illegal actions that would violate the law 78 to support the student movement“.
Depuis quelques jours, une lettre ouverte signée par un groupe nommé “Le groupe hétérodoxe” circule dans les milieux de la FTQ, sur les sites web, les blogues et facebook. Cette lettre, très critique de la direction actuelle de la FTQ, soulève selon nous certains problèmes importants du syndicalisme d’affaire pratiqué à la FTQ, dont la proximité avec le patronat.
Monsieur Arsenault, vous devez quitter la présidence parce qu’à la FTQ, on n’est pas tous et toutes dans le même bateau !
Diviser pour régner, cette stratégie politique est le parfait contraire des valeurs syndicales que nous défendons. Pourtant vos agissements des dernières années, en tant que président de la FTQ, ont eu des retombées beaucoup plus négatives que positives sur l’ensemble de la Fédération et de ses syndicats affiliés. Nous vous demandons donc de quitter la direction de la Fédération lors du prochain congrès. La dernière chose dont nous avons besoin, c’est d’un banquier à la tête de la FTQ.